Players

Eddie Cordero 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	16	7	-

Season 10 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
246 52nd	.556 27th	30 42nd	27 328th	92 9th

Career Honors

S102nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	15	.533	4	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.43
3	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	12	.333	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.33
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	8	1.000	9	4	1	1.33	16	.938	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.39
6	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	0	11	1.000	4	1	2	0.25	12	.833	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	16	.688	3	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.52
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	5	2	3	0.67	11	.727	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.61
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	14	.500	1	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.85
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	6	2	4	0.67	13	.692	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.68
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	13	.538	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	14.0	10.00
16	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	10	.300	8	1	2	0.25	20	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.65
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	15	.600	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	14.0	10.00
20	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	9	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.71
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	12	.750	2	2	3	0.67	11	.727	.	.	.	.	14.5	9.33
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	12	.417	8	3	1	0.60	21	.952	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.12
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	13	.385	9	2	3	0.50	19	.842	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.82
27	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	14	.571	4	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.95
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	14	.357	4	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.74
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	1	19	.737	7	0	3	0.00	21	.857	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.90
34	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	7	25	.320	9	2	2	0.40	22	.909	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.06
37	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	16	.500	11	2	3	0.50	23	.870	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.64
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	13	.692	7	1	3	0.33	15	.800	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.94
42	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	0	11	.818	8	1	2	0.25	19	.895	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.84
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	18	.444	3	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.03
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	11	.818	5	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.80
47	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	23	.435	4	1	0	0.25	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.02
Total		92	246	2.67	56	342	.556	144	30	47	0.33	388	.879	.	.	.	.	323.0	7.61

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.43
3	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.33
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.39
6	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	10	10	0	2.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.52
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.61
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.85
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.68
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	10.00
16	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.65
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	10.00
20	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.71
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	9.33
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.12
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.82
27	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.95
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.74
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.90
34	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.06
37	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.64
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.94
42	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.84
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.03
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.80
47	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.02
Total		92	2	90	92	7	1.00	27	0.29	.	.	.	.	.	323.0	7.61