Players

Tobias Westphal 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	-	-	16	12

Season 10 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
227 1st	2.35 21st	.964 11th	101 72nd	24 80th

Career Honors

S91st All-PAC-8

S101st All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	2	0.67	6	.333	1.0	7.24
2	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	0	0.67	17	1.000	3	1.00	8	.375	2.0	8.58
5	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	7	.143	0.0	6.28
6	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	2.0	9.46
7	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	1	0.33	5	.200	1.0	8.76
9	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	6	1.50	12	.500	0.0	10.00
10	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	3	0.33	14	.786	4	1.33	7	.571	1.0	8.59
12	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	.545	0.0	7.93
13	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	3	0.40	16	.813	8	1.60	10	.800	2.0	8.29
16	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	6	2.00	10	.600	0.0	4.54
18	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.50	12	.833	8	2.00	12	.667	2.0	10.00
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.68
21	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	3	0.20	17	.824	3	0.60	5	.600	1.0	6.53
22	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	15	.800	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	7.28
25	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	1	0.33	2	.500	2.0	8.52
26	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	2	0.33	16	.875	5	1.67	11	.455	1.0	10.00
29	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	3	0.25	16	.813	5	1.25	7	.714	1.0	8.28
33	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	4	1.33	7	.571	2.0	6.63
34	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	3	0.67	17	.824	9	3.00	14	.643	2.0	8.36
35	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.25	11	.909	3	0.75	5	.600	1.0	5.05
39	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	4	1.33	8	.500	1.0	5.28
40	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	3	1.00	6	.500	1.0	6.10
44	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.33	13	.923	7	2.33	9	.778	1.0	8.57
45	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	17	.824	3	0.60	8	.375	0.0	5.60
Total		86	.	.	.	.	.	116	24	34	0.28	289	.882	101	1.17	183	.552	24.0	7.56

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.57	14	0	1.000	1.0	7.24
2	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	6	2.25	12	0	1.000	2.0	8.58
5	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	11	2.26	19	1	.947	0.0	6.28
6	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	12	2.44	18	1	.944	2.0	9.46
7	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	13	2.33	21	1	.952	1.0	8.76
9	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	12	2.52	21	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
10	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	2.41	17	0	1.000	1.0	8.59
12	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	19	2.41	29	2	.931	0.0	7.93
13	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	20	2.72	25	1	.960	2.0	8.29
16	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	4	1.93	14	0	1.000	0.0	4.54
18	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	22	5.50	7	2.46	13	0	1.000	2.0	10.00
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.22	18	2	.889	0.0	5.68
21	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	15	2.32	25	1	.960	1.0	6.53
22	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	12	2.32	22	1	.955	0.0	7.28
25	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	7	2.33	12	0	1.000	2.0	8.52
26	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	9	2.57	14	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
29	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	5	2.44	9	0	1.000	1.0	8.28
33	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.32	22	1	.955	2.0	6.63
34	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.50	14	1	.929	2.0	8.36
35	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	8	2.00	17	2	.882	1.0	5.05
39	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	5	1.85	13	0	1.000	1.0	5.28
40	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.29	17	1	.941	1.0	6.10
44	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.58	12	0	1.000	1.0	8.57
45	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	8	2.17	18	0	1.000	0.0	5.60
Total		86	.	.	.	.	.	227	2.64	240	2.35	416	15	.964	24.0	7.56