Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	2	.500	5	1	5	0.20	19	.737	53	10.60	112	.473	2.0	4.78
7	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	34	11.33	71	.479	1.5	6.63
9	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	3	8	-.125	1	0	4	0.00	15	.733	58	11.60	99	.586	5.5	6.98
10	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	5	0	3	0.00	17	.824	51	12.75	106	.481	3.0	8.26
15	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	7	.571	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	28	9.33	43	.651	5.0	6.65
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	5	0	3	0.00	12	.750	30	10.00	49	.612	3.0	6.56
44	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	33	11.00	58	.569	1.0	5.21
45	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	3	4	-.750	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	32	10.67	65	.492	1.5	4.90
Total		29	10	0.34	6	34	.118	31	2	22	0.07	110	.800	319	11.00	603	.529	22.5	6.25

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.78
7	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.63
9	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	2	3	5	1	1.00	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.98
10	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.26
15	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.65
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.56
44	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.21
45	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.90
Total		29	3	15	18	3	0.62	30	1.03	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	6.25