Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	8	.375	10	1	3	0.33	18	.833	36	12.00	76	.474	5.0	8.26
4	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	1	1	1	0.25	8	.875	47	11.75	96	.490	3.0	6.26
8	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	2	1	2	0.33	10	.800	24	8.00	60	.400	4.0	3.62
14	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	25	8.33	66	.379	0.0	2.48
15	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	0	9	.667	10	2	2	0.40	23	.913	36	7.20	106	.340	13.0	5.37
17	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	6	.500	6	1	2	0.25	15	.867	44	11.00	97	.454	5.5	6.62
18	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	10	.000	14	4	3	1.00	23	.870	43	10.75	106	.406	8.5	7.44
22	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	5	1	3	0.33	12	.750	35	11.67	74	.473	2.5	7.42
29	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	10	5	0	1.25	21	1.000	34	8.50	93	.366	6.0	4.89
Total		33	21	0.64	6	46	.326	60	16	18	0.48	140	.871	324	9.82	774	.419	47.5	5.82

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.26
4	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.26
8	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.62
14	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.48
15	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	10	10	0	2.00	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.37
17	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.62
18	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.44
22	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.42
29	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.89
Total		33	1	19	20	1	0.61	44	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	47.5	5.82