Players

Joseph Wilcox 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	15	17	15	12

Career Honors

S92nd All-PAC-8

S102nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	5	27	.481	7	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.40
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	9	2	1	0.67	15	.933	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.59
5	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	14	.571	9	2	2	0.50	18	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	16.5	7.67
6	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	23	.565	4	1	2	0.25	16	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	20.5	9.01
8	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	1	24	.792	11	2	1	0.50	22	.955	1	0.25	2	.500	23.0	9.40
9	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	17	.412	8	1	3	0.33	15	.800	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.85
10	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	10	.600	4	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.77
12	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	0	22	.864	12	3	2	0.60	23	.913	2	0.40	2	1.000	24.0	8.19
13	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	6	26	.462	10	3	0	0.75	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	22.5	9.06
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	25	.240	13	3	3	0.60	26	.885	2	0.40	3	.667	18.0	6.08
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	20	.650	7	2	1	0.67	13	.923	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	10.00
20	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	28	.500	3	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	20.0	7.35
22	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	2	23	.609	6	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.38
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	22	.773	5	1	2	0.20	18	.889	3	0.60	4	.750	21.5	7.06
27	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	15	.200	5	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.61
30	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	1	24	.625	12	5	1	1.00	24	.958	.	.	.	.	24.0	8.26
32	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	27	5.40	6	45	.467	14	0	2	0.00	26	.923	.	.	.	.	27.5	8.95
34	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	14	.500	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	7.27
37	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	3	22	.636	8	2	2	0.50	19	.895	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.62
Total		75	284	3.79	58	411	.550	152	31	31	0.41	338	.908	8	0.11	16	.500	347.5	7.97

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	14	2.76	17	0	1.000	19.5	9.40
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	6	2.00	6	2.60	10	0	1.000	12.0	7.59
5	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	9	9	0	2.25	6	1.50	15	2.60	20	1	.950	16.5	7.67
6	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	4	1.00	13	2.67	18	0	1.000	20.5	9.01
8	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	8	2.54	13	0	1.000	23.0	9.40
9	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	9	2.62	13	0	1.000	13.0	8.85
10	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	1	2.33	3	1.00	7	2.78	9	0	1.000	13.5	7.77
12	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	11	2.41	17	1	.941	24.0	8.19
13	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	15	2.29	24	3	.875	22.5	9.06
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	9	1.80	10	2.10	21	2	.905	18.0	6.08
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	11	3.67	5	2.83	6	0	1.000	17.0	10.00
20	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	13	2.36	22	1	.955	20.0	7.35
22	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	14	2.57	21	0	1.000	17.5	8.38
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	7	2.07	14	2	.857	21.5	7.06
27	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.23	13	1	.923	8.0	4.61
30	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	6	1.20	19	2.54	28	0	1.000	24.0	8.26
32	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	12	2.40	20	0	1.000	27.5	8.95
34	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	9	2.43	14	1	.929	10.5	7.27
37	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	7	1.94	18	2	.889	19.0	6.62
Total		75	2	61	63	2	0.84	88	1.17	202	2.43	318	14	.956	347.5	7.97