Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	3	.667	0.0	4.75
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	.444	0.0	6.13
6	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	.625	0.0	6.56
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	3.05
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	.400	0.0	2.30
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	.444	0.0	4.10
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	9	.889	0.0	2.78
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	13	.769	0.0	7.94
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	5	.200	0.0	3.75
18	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	11	.455	0.0	4.73
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	.750	0.0	4.21
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	7.33
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	8	.750	0.0	3.71
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	.750	0.0	6.46
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	4.27
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	8.01
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	4	.250	0.0	5.33
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	.625	0.0	3.20
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	9	.556	0.0	3.15
Total		71	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	82	1.15	142	.577	0.0	4.83

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	13	2.23	26	1	.962	0.0	4.75
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.17	18	1	.944	0.0	6.13
6	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	15	2.34	29	0	1.000	0.0	6.56
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.16	19	1	.947	0.0	3.05
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	1.63	19	3	.842	0.0	2.30
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	1.96	26	4	.846	0.0	4.10
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	14	2.03	34	2	.941	0.0	2.78
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	6	2.63	8	0	1.000	0.0	7.94
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	22	2.33	42	2	.952	0.0	3.75
18	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	22	2.40	35	1	.971	0.0	4.73
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	3	1.73	15	1	.933	0.0	4.21
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	13	2.09	22	3	.864	0.0	7.33
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	22	2.26	35	4	.886	0.0	3.71
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	1	1.83	6	0	1.000	0.0	6.46
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	2.33	21	0	1.000	0.0	4.27
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	2.39	18	1	.944	0.0	8.01
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	18	2.41	32	0	1.000	0.0	5.33
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	13	2.03	32	2	.938	0.0	3.20
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	19	2.08	38	4	.895	0.0	3.15
Total		71	.	.	.	.	.	111	1.56	238	2.18	475	30	.937	0.0	4.83