Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	7	.857	6	2.00	7	.857	0.0	8.03
5	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	8.42
7	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	3.95
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	6	2.00	12	.500	0.0	5.83
10	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	4	.500	0.0	5.20
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	9	.778	0.0	4.10
13	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	15	.600	0.0	4.61
16	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	.750	0.0	5.31
19	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	4.45
20	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	6.53
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	6	.333	0.0	5.31
24	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	3.10
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	6.99
26	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	4	.750	0.0	4.35
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	.500	0.0	7.28
32	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	5.31
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	1.000	0.0	5.98
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	3	.667	0.0	5.88
39	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	9	.556	0.0	2.75
42	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	4.95
44	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	4	.250	0.0	5.66
46	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	6	.833	0.0	6.08
47	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	3	.333	0.0	1.95
Total		86	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	17	.941	89	1.03	147	.605	0.0	5.31

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	4	2.33	6	0	1.000	0.0	8.03
5	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	5	2.30	10	0	1.000	0.0	8.42
7	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	1	1.86	7	0	1.000	0.0	3.95
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	2.22	9	0	1.000	0.0	5.83
10	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	8	2.00	21	1	.952	0.0	5.20
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	2.26	23	1	.957	0.0	4.10
13	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	13	2.25	24	1	.958	0.0	4.61
16	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.57	14	0	1.000	0.0	5.31
19	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	5	1.93	14	1	.929	0.0	4.45
20	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	13	2.55	20	0	1.000	0.0	6.53
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	2.53	17	0	1.000	0.0	5.31
24	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	8	2.12	17	1	.941	0.0	3.10
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	2.57	14	0	1.000	0.0	6.99
26	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	10	2.32	19	0	1.000	0.0	4.35
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.44	18	1	.944	0.0	7.28
32	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.33	15	0	1.000	0.0	5.31
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	6	2.27	11	0	1.000	0.0	5.98
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	5	2.67	6	0	1.000	0.0	5.88
39	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	7	2.00	16	1	.938	0.0	2.75
42	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	2.42	12	1	.917	0.0	4.95
44	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	13	2.63	16	0	1.000	0.0	5.66
46	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	10	2.00	25	3	.880	0.0	6.08
47	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	5	1.92	13	1	.923	0.0	1.95
Total		86	.	.	.	.	.	139	1.62	187	2.27	347	12	.965	0.0	5.31