Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	4	1.33	8	.500	0.0	5.03
5	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	10	2.50	14	.714	0.0	6.28
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	9.71
8	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	5	1.25	6	.833	0.0	5.90
10	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	5	1.67	10	.500	0.0	10.00
11	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	3	1.00	9	.333	0.0	8.58
13	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	1	0.50	16	.938	3	0.75	5	.600	2.0	10.00
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.63
18	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	.625	0.0	8.72
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	5.40
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	3	0.60	7	.429	0.0	4.65
23	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	1.0	5.51
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	2	0.67	3	.667	1.0	4.33
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.67	12	.917	4	1.33	5	.800	2.0	9.12
30	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.20	11	1.000	5	1.00	7	.714	1.0	3.75
33	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	0	0.60	20	1.000	4	0.80	5	.800	3.0	8.45
35	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	6.93
38	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	3.05
39	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	13	.923	7	1.40	12	.583	0.0	4.35
40	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.25	12	.917	3	0.75	7	.429	1.0	7.63
44	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.25	12	.750	5	1.25	6	.833	1.0	8.25
45	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	2	0.00	17	.882	3	0.60	5	.600	0.0	6.10
Total		83	.	.	.	.	.	72	12	24	0.14	199	.879	86	1.04	140	.614	12.0	6.70

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.25	12	2	.833	0.0	5.03
5	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	8	2.20	15	1	.933	0.0	6.28
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	2.80	15	0	1.000	0.0	9.71
8	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	12	2.21	19	3	.842	0.0	5.90
10	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	4	2.50	6	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
11	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.70	10	0	1.000	0.0	8.58
13	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	18	4.50	9	2.54	13	0	1.000	2.0	10.00
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.33	15	1	.933	0.0	5.63
18	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	14	2.58	19	1	.947	0.0	8.72
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	5	2.00	10	1	.900	0.0	5.40
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	14	2.38	21	2	.905	0.0	4.65
23	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	13	2.52	21	0	1.000	1.0	5.51
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.25	12	1	.917	1.0	4.33
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	3	2.33	6	0	1.000	2.0	9.12
30	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	6	1.90	21	1	.952	1.0	3.75
33	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	11	2.60	15	0	1.000	3.0	8.45
35	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	15	2.28	25	2	.920	0.0	6.93
38	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	13	2.00	25	4	.840	0.0	3.05
39	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	22	2.11	44	5	.886	0.0	4.35
40	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	19	2.47	30	0	1.000	1.0	7.63
44	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	18	2.37	27	1	.963	1.0	8.25
45	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	15	2.21	28	2	.929	0.0	6.10
Total		83	.	.	.	.	.	175	2.11	245	2.31	409	27	.934	12.0	6.70