Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference League Round 7

Why Do I Care?

Teutopolis Twisters

Mike Cabral

(H)
at Nashville

Nashville Red Pandas

Roy Rolsten

Nashville leads series 16-11

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Teutopolis			Nashville
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
79.00	B	Libero		B-	76.00
90.00	A	Middle Blockers		A+	97.88
86.38	A-	Outside Hitters		A-	87.00
78.25	B	Right Side		B+	83.75
92.00	A	Setter		B	80.25
		Skills Prediction

	27 MATCHES
11	WINS	16
9	HOME	12
0	AWAY	3
2	NEUTRAL	1

Teutopolis		Nashville
#3	ELO Rank	#7

1,533.15	ELO Rating	1,523.55 (+145)

0.0%	ELO Winning Chance	0.0%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.248 19th	ATTACK PCT	.238 22nd
10.80 23rd	KILLS PER SET	10.73 25th
.879 6th	SERVE PCT	.863 12th
2.4 3rd	ACES PER SET	1.45 20th
.447 21st	ASSIST PCT	.498 13th
10.5 22nd	ASSISTS PER SET	10.55 21st
10.3 1st	BLOCKS PER SET	4.91 12th
9.8 3rd	DIGS PER SET	5.36 32nd
.937 5th	RECEIVE PCT	.919 16th
2.101 24th	PASSER RATING	2.137 16th

	TOP TWO
Gardiner (OH) 25 Trimper (OH) 18	KILLS	Plummer (RS) 23 McAdoo (MB) 23
Gardiner (OH) .750 Stafford (MB) .625	ATTACK PCT	McAdoo (MB) .655 Howard (MB) .520
Hamlin (S) 75 Nolte (S) 24	ASSISTS	Cutter (S) 91 Spence (S) 19
Stafford (MB) 4 Hibbard (MB) 3	ACES	Howard (MB) 5 Garrity (OH) 3
Gardiner (OH) 16 Hibbard (MB) 14	BLOCKS	Morris (OH) 12 McAdoo (MB) 11
Peralta (L) 17 Bowers (L) 15	DIGS	Stoff (L) 15 Morris (OH) 11
Gardiner (OH) 2.42 Faber (OH) 2.10	PASSER RTG	Garrity (OH) 2.53 Brown (OH) 2.44

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
1.		Elliot Hamlin Senior A- 12.50 Assists Per Set 2.00 Service Pts Per Set	8.82

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
7.		Edward Gardiner Junior B+ 4.17 Kills Per Set 2.42 Passer Rating	8.85

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
8.		Alejandro De Cecco Soph. C+ 1.50 Kills Per Set 2.00 Blocks Per Set	8.14

#	TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
2.	Daniel Stafford Senior B 2.00 Blocks Per Set 3.00 Kills Per Set	8.93
3.	Tyler Hibbard Senior A 2.33 Blocks Per Set 1.50 Kills Per Set	8.91
7.	Isaac McAdoo Senior A+ 1.38 Blocks Per Set 2.88 Kills Per Set	8.59

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
5	2	Apr 09, 2022	0	-	3	16-25	15-25	18-25			SEC	1	-	0
5	11	Apr 30, 2022	0	-	3	15-25	11-25	14-25			SEC	1	-	1
5	33	Jun 04, 2022	3	- (n)	1	25-22	24-26	25-23	25-23		Holyoke Invitational5-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	2	-	1
6	4	Aug 06, 2022	0	-	3	15-25	15-25	20-25			SEC	3	-	1
6	13	Aug 27, 2022	0	-	3	17-25	20-25	22-25			SEC	3	-	2
7	8	Dec 03, 2022	0	-	3	16-25	17-25	14-25			SEC	4	-	2
7	34	Jan 21, 2023	0	-	3	17-25	13-25	13-25			SEC	4	-	3
8	1	Feb 19, 2023	0	-	3	19-25	16-25	12-25			SEC	4	-	4
8	10	Mar 12, 2023	0	-	3	17-25	12-25	17-25			SEC	5	-	4
9	2	May 29, 2023	0	-	3	17-25	21-25	19-25			SEC	6	-	4
9	11	Jun 18, 2023	0	-	3	11-25	10-25	13-25			SEC	6	-	5
9	19	Jul 02, 2023	0	-	3	17-25	14-25	12-25			SEC Tournament9-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	6	-	6
9	35	Jul 30, 2023	3	- (n)	0	27-25	25-21	25-23			TMVL Cup	6	-	7
10	7	Sep 24, 2023	0	-	3	14-25	13-25	23-25			SEC	7	-	7
10	29	Nov 05, 2023	0	-	3	21-25	23-25	18-25			SEC	7	-	8
11	8	Dec 31, 2023	3	-	1	25-19	22-25	25-21	25-14		SEC	7	-	9
11	34	Feb 18, 2024	0	-	3	21-25	13-25	14-25			SEC	7	-	10
12	14	May 27, 2024	0	-	3	20-25	19-25	15-25			SEC	7	-	11
12	23	Jun 09, 2024	0	-	3	15-25	16-25	22-25			SEC Tournament12-23Semifinals SEC Tournament	7	-	12
12	40	Jul 07, 2024	1	- (n)	3	21-25	25-23	19-25	22-25		TMVL Cup	8	-	12
12	44	Jul 14, 2024	3	-	0	25-20	25-18	25-16			SEC	8	-	13
13	1	Sep 15, 2024	0	-	3	16-25	14-25	6-25			SEC	9	-	13
13	10	Oct 06, 2024	0	-	3	17-25	16-25	22-25			SEC	9	-	14
13	19	Oct 20, 2024	3	-	2	23-25	22-25	25-23	25-19	15-12	SEC Tournament13-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	9	-	15
14	14	Jan 12, 2025	0	-	3	6-25	17-25	14-25			SEC	9	-	16
14	44	Mar 09, 2025	1	-	3	20-25	16-25	25-22	15-25		SEC	10	-	16
15	1	Jun 08, 2025	0	-	3	9-25	11-25	12-25			SEC	11	-	16
15	10	Jun 29, 2025									SEC

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.