Players

Nathaniel Solomon 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	14	11	-

Season 10 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
174 121st	.431 102nd	26 65th	31 310th	94 7th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	12	.083	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.49
6	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	15	.267	17	6	2	1.20	26	.923	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.24
7	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	7	.429	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.48
8	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	15	.733	7	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.5	10.00
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	18	.778	8	2	2	0.50	18	.889	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.65
12	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.68
13	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	17	.471	11	1	2	0.20	24	.917	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.33
14	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	11	.000	8	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.63
17	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	9	.444	5	3	0	0.75	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.61
19	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	20	.250	9	2	3	0.50	18	.833	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.60
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	10	.300	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.11
23	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	13	.231	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.50
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	10	.800	7	4	1	1.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.90
26	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	14	.214	4	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.55
31	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	5	1.000	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.87
32	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	8	.625	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.62
34	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	12	.333	4	1	1	0.25	11	.909	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.69
36	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	14	.429	7	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.42
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	4	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.42
41	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	16	.625	1	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.98
44	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	14	.357	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.50
46	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	16	.375	6	1	3	0.20	16	.813	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.75
Total		81	174	2.15	56	274	.431	121	26	31	0.32	293	.894	.	.	.	.	249.0	7.18

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.49
6	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	1	1.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.24
7	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.48
8	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	10.00
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.65
12	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.68
13	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.33
14	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.63
17	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.61
19	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.60
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.11
23	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.50
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.90
26	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.55
31	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	6	7	1	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.87
32	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.62
34	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	8	9	0	2.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.69
36	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.42
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.42
41	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.98
44	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.50
46	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.75
Total		81	4	90	94	9	1.16	31	0.38	.	.	.	.	.	249.0	7.18