Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	3	10	-.300	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	49	12.25	91	.538	0.0	6.58
3	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	22	7.33	66	.333	1.0	2.71
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	34	11.33	55	.618	3.5	7.26
12	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	26	8.67	60	.433	3.0	3.92
15	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	7	1	1	0.33	14	.929	45	15.00	70	.643	2.5	9.06
18	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	2	4	-.500	6	1	1	0.20	18	.944	58	11.60	90	.644	2.0	6.52
21	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	2	6	-.333	8	1	1	0.20	18	.944	63	12.60	110	.573	3.0	7.80
31	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	6	.167	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	52	10.40	97	.536	4.0	6.07
36	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	6	.500	3	1	3	0.25	15	.800	48	12.00	87	.552	5.0	7.32
41	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	4	.000	2	1	2	0.20	13	.846	54	10.80	93	.581	5.0	5.98
Total		40	9	0.23	7	52	.038	47	7	16	0.18	133	.880	451	11.28	819	.551	29.0	6.32

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	6.58
3	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.71
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.26
12	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.92
15	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	9.06
18	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	2	0.20	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.52
21	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	2	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.80
31	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.07
36	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.32
41	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.98
Total		40	3	20	23	6	0.58	39	0.98	.	.	.	.	.	29.0	6.32