Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	4	2	4	0.67	11	.636	23	7.67	73	.315	4.5	4.46
3	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	4	0	5	0.00	17	.706	51	10.20	84	.607	1.5	4.92
8	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	7	.286	8	2	3	0.50	20	.850	49	12.25	92	.533	6.5	9.00
11	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	2	1.000	3	2	2	0.50	14	.857	42	10.50	82	.512	4.0	4.64
14	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	3	0	3	0.00	17	.824	58	11.60	100	.580	2.5	6.38
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	10	2	2	0.67	17	.882	30	10.00	60	.500	3.5	6.46
18	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	5	2	3	0.67	11	.727	24	8.00	49	.490	6.5	5.04
19	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	7	.286	9	2	2	0.40	23	.913	50	10.00	74	.676	4.0	4.87
29	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	4	.000	6	1	3	0.20	20	.850	63	12.60	111	.568	2.5	8.20
36	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	37	12.33	57	.649	4.5	8.26
Total		40	18	0.45	1	47	.362	57	13	29	0.33	163	.822	427	10.68	782	.546	40.0	6.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.46
3	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.92
8	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	9.00
11	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.64
14	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.38
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.46
18	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.04
19	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.87
29	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.20
36	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.26
Total		40	1	16	17	0	0.43	46	1.15	.	.	.	.	.	40.0	6.22