Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
7	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	6	31	.387	8	1	1	0.25	17	.941	.	.	.	.	21.5	10.00
10	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	11	.636	8	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.04
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	20	.450	4	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.16
12	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	12	.667	13	4	2	1.00	20	.900	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.62
17	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	7	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.95
18	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	28	.357	10	2	4	0.50	18	.778	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.58
21	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	18	.556	3	2	4	0.50	15	.733	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.74
22	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	20	6.67	0	21	.952	11	2	0	0.67	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	23.5	10.00
24	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	20	.450	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	15.5	10.00
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	18	.500	10	3	2	1.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
Total		35	122	3.49	27	187	.508	79	16	18	0.46	157	.885	.	.	.	.	158.0	8.71

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
7	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	10.00
10	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.04
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.16
12	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.62
17	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.95
18	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.58
21	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.74
22	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	23.5	10.00
24	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	10.00
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
Total		35	2	36	38	1	1.09	46	1.31	.	.	.	.	.	158.0	8.71