Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	2	0.25	14	.857	3	0.75	5	.600	1.0	6.05
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	4	1.33	4	1.000	1.0	6.94
7	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	9.01
11	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	1	0.50	13	.923	6	1.50	6	1.000	2.0	9.49
14	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	2	0.67	9	.222	0.0	7.33
19	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.25	14	.857	5	1.25	6	.833	1.0	3.90
21	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	0	0.00	5	.000	1.0	5.88
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	4	0.00	8	.500	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	5.75
36	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	6	1.20	6	1.000	0.0	5.25
41	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	3	0.50	16	.813	2	0.50	13	.154	2.0	6.53
46	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	3	0.33	16	.813	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	8.03
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	46	9	21	0.23	132	.841	33	0.83	67	.493	9.0	6.74

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	15	2.19	31	2	.935	1.0	6.05
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.40	20	0	1.000	1.0	6.94
7	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	16	2.73	22	0	1.000	0.0	9.01
11	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	8	2.36	14	0	1.000	2.0	9.49
14	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	8	2.00	20	1	.950	0.0	7.33
19	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	9	1.91	22	2	.909	1.0	3.90
21	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	17	2.28	32	2	.938	1.0	5.88
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.28	18	3	.833	0.0	5.75
36	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	14	2.10	31	3	.903	0.0	5.25
41	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	11	2.19	21	1	.952	2.0	6.53
46	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	7	2.21	14	0	1.000	1.0	8.03
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	96	2.40	130	2.23	245	14	.943	9.0	6.74