Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	6.58
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	4	0	1.00	22	1.000	7	1.75	10	.700	4.0	5.98
6	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	7.48
7	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	5	0.20	20	.750	2	0.40	5	.400	1.0	6.03
11	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	3	1	0.75	13	.923	3	0.75	10	.300	3.0	7.40
12	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	3	0.33	10	.700	1	0.33	2	.500	1.0	4.85
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	6.49
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	4	1.33	8	.500	1.0	7.45
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	0	0.00	4	.000	0.0	4.63
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	6.21
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	3	1.00	9	.333	0.0	5.38
31	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	8	2.67	13	.615	0.0	5.01
34	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	4.08
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	3.35
44	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.25	14	.929	5	1.25	8	.625	1.0	3.51
Total		50	.	.	.	.	.	62	11	23	0.22	173	.867	44	0.88	98	.449	11.0	5.63

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	2.57	7	0	1.000	0.0	6.58
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	11	2.42	19	0	1.000	4.0	5.98
6	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.28	18	0	1.000	0.0	7.48
7	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	21	2.42	31	3	.903	1.0	6.03
11	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	8	2.11	19	1	.947	3.0	7.40
12	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	2.53	15	0	1.000	1.0	4.85
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.35	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.49
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	2.29	17	1	.941	1.0	7.45
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.47	17	0	1.000	0.0	4.63
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	14	2.65	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.21
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.26	19	1	.947	0.0	5.38
31	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	2.17	12	0	1.000	0.0	5.01
34	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.35	23	1	.957	0.0	4.08
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.23	13	1	.923	0.0	3.35
44	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	8	2.10	21	1	.952	1.0	3.51
Total		50	.	.	.	.	.	83	1.66	147	2.34	265	9	.966	11.0	5.63