Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	4	.250	0.0	4.20
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	6.50
8	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	6	.667	0.0	4.03
14	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	2.60
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	7.11
17	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	5.16
21	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	3	0.00	16	.813	4	1.00	6	.667	0.0	3.56
33	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	12	.583	0.0	3.26
36	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	4	.500	0.0	6.78
39	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	4.83
46	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	10	.700	0.0	3.25
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	11	0	7	0.00	31	.774	38	0.97	66	.576	0.0	4.66

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	1.91	32	3	.906	0.0	4.20
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	11	2.05	21	3	.857	0.0	6.50
8	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	17	2.06	36	4	.889	0.0	4.03
14	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	1.95	22	2	.909	0.0	2.60
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.56	16	1	.938	0.0	7.11
17	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	2.35	20	2	.900	0.0	5.16
21	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	20	2.14	35	5	.857	0.0	3.56
33	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.15	26	2	.923	0.0	3.26
36	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	18	2.09	43	2	.953	0.0	6.78
39	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	1.77	26	4	.846	0.0	4.83
46	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	12	2.11	27	2	.926	0.0	3.25
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	70	1.79	145	2.08	304	30	.901	0.0	4.66