Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	7	1	3	0.33	12	.750	32	10.67	63	.508	4.5	7.62
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	2	1	3	0.33	8	.625	39	13.00	59	.661	2.0	8.35
8	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	4	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	35	11.67	65	.538	5.0	7.15
9	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	4	.000	7	2	3	0.40	18	.833	58	11.60	105	.552	4.5	6.42
11	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	6	.333	8	0	1	0.00	20	.950	47	9.40	97	.485	3.0	5.20
13	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	7	.000	4	1	0	0.25	15	1.000	44	11.00	88	.500	4.5	6.08
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	5	0	3	0.00	18	.833	63	12.60	105	.600	6.5	8.73
18	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	5	1	1	0.33	14	.929	34	11.33	77	.442	2.5	7.50
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	5	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	31	10.33	58	.534	3.0	5.95
35	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	6	.000	7	0	1	0.00	14	.929	29	9.67	58	.500	0.0	5.04
Total		37	11	0.30	5	40	.150	54	10	15	0.27	141	.894	412	11.14	775	.532	35.5	6.80

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.62
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.35
8	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.15
9	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	2	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.42
11	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.20
13	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.08
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	9	9	1	1.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.73
18	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.50
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.95
35	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.04
Total		37	1	27	28	6	0.76	39	1.05	.	.	.	.	.	35.5	6.80