Players

Matthew Patterson 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	16	12	14	10	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	6	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.97
2	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	19	.474	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	8.00
4	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	6	19	.053	5	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.43
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	22	.500	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	16.5	8.54
9	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	12	.333	9	1	2	0.25	16	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	5.97
10	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	4	.500	3	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.94
12	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	5	31	.387	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.22
13	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	19	.579	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.17
14	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	24	.333	1	0	1	0.00	11	.909	2	0.50	2	1.000	14.0	6.73
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	11	.273	5	2	4	0.67	11	.636	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.80
21	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	21	.333	10	3	0	1.00	16	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	13.0	7.52
25	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	18	.389	7	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.10
26	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	18	.167	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.06
35	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	17	.235	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	5.82
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	12	.417	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.65
40	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	7	34	.324	4	1	3	0.20	14	.786	1	0.20	1	1.000	20.5	7.24
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	8	30	.267	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.23
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	23	.391	10	3	0	1.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.93
Total		64	178	2.78	62	342	.339	77	18	25	0.28	212	.882	4	0.06	8	.500	218.5	6.24

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	4	2.25	8	0	1.000	4.5	4.97
2	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	2.40	20	1	.950	14.0	8.00
4	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	19	2.21	38	4	.895	9.0	3.43
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	6	2.38	13	0	1.000	16.5	8.54
9	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	12	3.00	12	2.50	20	0	1.000	8.5	5.97
10	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.24	21	2	.905	5.0	3.94
12	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	23	2.11	37	7	.811	19.0	6.22
13	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	9	2.25	13	2.32	22	1	.955	15.0	7.17
14	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	14	2.45	22	1	.955	14.0	6.73
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	3	1.00	12	2.79	14	0	1.000	9.5	5.80
21	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.31	13	0	1.000	13.0	7.52
25	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	8	1.90	20	4	.800	14.5	7.10
26	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	4	0.80	13	2.13	31	2	.935	9.0	3.06
35	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	2.53	19	0	1.000	8.0	5.82
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	15	2.48	21	1	.952	7.0	4.65
40	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	15	2.33	30	0	1.000	20.5	7.24
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	2.14	29	0	1.000	16.0	7.23
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	11	2.60	15	0	1.000	15.5	8.93
Total		64	2	41	43	3	0.67	83	1.30	216	2.30	393	23	.941	218.5	6.24