Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	3.40
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	15	.800	1	0.25	5	.200	0.0	4.60
25	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	12	.750	5	1.00	12	.417	0.0	4.75
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	1	0.33	2	.500	1.0	6.21
36	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	10	.800	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.77
44	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	4	1.00	10	.400	0.0	3.70
Total		22	.	.	.	.	.	21	1	9	0.05	58	.845	14	0.64	35	.400	1.0	4.57

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	13	2.12	26	3	.885	0.0	3.40
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	14	2.03	31	3	.903	0.0	4.60
25	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	16	1.94	36	4	.889	0.0	4.75
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	13	2.00	33	3	.909	1.0	6.21
36	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	1.85	20	3	.850	0.0	4.77
44	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	10	2.15	20	2	.900	0.0	3.70
Total		22	.	.	.	.	.	29	1.32	74	2.01	166	18	.892	1.0	4.57