Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	0	0.00	6	.000	0.0	4.60
2	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3	1	0.75	23	.957	3	0.75	11	.273	3.0	7.91
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	8	.875	0	0.00	6	.000	1.0	10.00
5	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	7.33
9	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	19	.842	4	0.80	9	.444	0.0	7.23
11	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.50
15	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	4	2	1.33	18	.889	4	1.33	7	.571	4.0	7.10
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	4.75
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.33	13	.923	4	1.33	5	.800	1.0	7.01
22	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	3	0.75	22	.864	4	1.00	7	.571	3.0	6.31
29	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	3	0.40	18	.833	7	1.40	9	.778	2.0	7.10
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	60	14	18	0.36	155	.884	32	0.82	71	.451	14.0	6.71

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.13	15	1	.933	0.0	4.60
2	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	8	2.17	18	0	1.000	3.0	7.91
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	10	2.53	17	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
5	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	2.60	10	0	1.000	0.0	7.33
9	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	18	2.14	35	3	.914	0.0	7.23
11	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	16	2.03	32	6	.813	0.0	4.50
15	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.07	15	2	.867	4.0	7.10
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	2.04	28	3	.893	0.0	4.75
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.11	18	2	.889	1.0	7.01
22	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	13	2.07	28	3	.893	3.0	6.31
29	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	18	2.38	32	0	1.000	2.0	7.10
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	93	2.38	124	2.18	248	20	.919	14.0	6.71