Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	1	0.20	12	.083	0.0	8.18
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	4	1.33	9	.444	0.0	3.20
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	2.85
10	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	6.28
17	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.25	10	1.000	2	0.50	4	.500	1.0	5.00
21	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	5	.000	0.0	3.40
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.33	14	.857	7	2.33	10	.700	1.0	7.10
33	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	9	.556	0.0	8.55
36	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	16	.875	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	7.31
41	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	2	0.50	8	.250	1.0	5.53
46	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.20	15	.933	10	2.00	18	.556	1.0	5.73
Total		41	.	.	.	.	.	35	4	9	0.10	102	.912	40	0.98	94	.426	4.0	5.74

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	10	2.41	17	0	1.000	0.0	8.18
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	1.78	18	3	.833	0.0	3.20
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	1.75	24	4	.833	0.0	2.85
10	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	2.27	15	0	1.000	0.0	6.28
17	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	9	2.20	15	2	.867	1.0	5.00
21	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	2.29	17	2	.882	0.0	3.40
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	6	1.70	20	2	.900	1.0	7.10
33	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	16	2.36	25	1	.960	0.0	8.55
36	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	4.25	10	1.93	28	3	.893	0.0	7.31
41	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	10	2.25	20	1	.950	1.0	5.53
46	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	11	2.30	20	1	.950	1.0	5.73
Total		41	.	.	.	.	.	101	2.46	104	2.10	219	19	.913	4.0	5.74