Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Non-Conference League Round 6

Why Do I Care?

Columbia Crazy Tomatoes

Steve Turner

(H)
at New Orleans

New Orleans Swamp Rats

Kevin Martin

Columbia leads series 11-9

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Columbia			New Orleans
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
93.0	A	Libero		B+	84.0
88.0	A-	Middle Blockers		A+	96.5
89.5	A-	Outside Hitters		B+	85.0
94.0	A+	Right Side		A+	97.0
85.0	B+	Setter		B+	84.0
89.6 A-		Skills Prediction		89.7 A-

	20 MATCHES
11	WINS	9
5	HOME	6
1	AWAY	1
5	NEUTRAL	2

Columbia		New Orleans
#11	ELO Rank	#4
1,524.99	ELO Rating	1,575.10 (+145)
0.0%	ELO Winning Chance	0.0%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.365 9th	ATTACK PCT	.380 4th
12.97 7th	KILLS PER SET	12.96 8th
.871 4th	SERVE PCT	.866 7th
1.94 4th	ACES PER SET	1.6 15th
.554 9th	ASSIST PCT	.563 6th
12.56 9th	ASSISTS PER SET	12.48 12th
4.02 23rd	BLOCKS PER SET	4.69 7th
7.48 8th	DIGS PER SET	6.6 26th
.916 18th	RECEIVE PCT	.918 16th
2.215 3rd	PASSER RATING	2.191 7th

	TOP TWO
Berger (RS) 170 Greaves (OH) 113	KILLS	Solis (OH) 131 Douglas (RS) 113
Berger (RS) .579 Frank (OH) .536	ATTACK PCT	Byers (MB) .524 Douglas (RS) .511
Labonte (S) 541 Fuertes (S) 183	ASSISTS	Moreano (S) 448 Fatulolo (S) 244
Frank (OH) 18 Carballo (MB) 17	ACES	Moreano (S) 17 Byers (MB) 16
Cordova (MB) 46 Berger (RS) 36	BLOCKS	Byers (MB) 48 Solis (OH) 42
Christiansen (L) 86 Delacroix (L) 49	DIGS	Bailey (L) 80 Atherton (OH) 47
Christiansen (L) 2.52 Burmeister (OH) 2.34	PASSER RTG	Bailey (L) 2.40 Atherton (OH) 2.28

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
6.	Chris Christiansen Senior A- 2.52 Passer Rating 2.05 Digs Per Set	7.52
13.	Timothy Bailey Junior B- 2.40 Passer Rating 2.11 Digs Per Set	7.07

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
9.		Jean-Luc Labonte Junior B 12.88 Assists Per Set 1.67 Service Pts Per Set	8.06

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
3.		Swen Berger Senior A- 4.05 Kills Per Set 0.86 Blocks Per Set	8.24

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
4.		Colin Byers Junior A 1.23 Blocks Per Set 2.69 Kills Per Set	8.28

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	7	Sep 05, 2020	3	-	2	27-25	25-23	13-25	23-25	16-14	Eastern Conference	0	-	1
1	22	Oct 03, 2020	2	-	3	24-26	18-25	25-23	25-23	8-15	Eastern Conference	0	-	2
2	6	Jan 30, 2021	0	-	3	18-25	20-25	27-29			Eastern Conference	1	-	2
2	20	Feb 27, 2021	2	-	3	25-23	24-26	25-22	19-25	13-15	Eastern Conference	1	-	3
2	43	Apr 03, 2021	3	- (n)	2	22-25	16-25	25-23	25-21	15-8	TMVL Shield	2	-	3
3	6	Aug 28, 2021	1	-	3	25-23	21-25	21-25	21-25		Eastern Conference	2	-	4
3	20	Sep 25, 2021	2	-	3	31-29	21-25	25-27	27-25	13-15	Eastern Conference	3	-	4
3	22	Sep 25, 2021	0	-	3	15-25	22-25	19-25			Eastern Conference Tournament3-22Quarterfinals Eastern Conference Tournament	3	-	5
4	17	Dec 25, 2021	0	-	3	20-25	20-25	21-25			Eastern Conference	4	-	5
4	28	Jan 15, 2022	3	-	0	25-23	25-15	25-22			Eastern Conference	5	-	5
5	35	Jun 11, 2022	1	- (n)	3	29-31	25-21	21-25	18-25		TMVL Cup	6	-	5
5	37	Jun 11, 2022	0	- (n)	3	17-25	23-25	22-25			National Championship5-37Quarterfinals National Championship	7	-	5
6	20	Sep 03, 2022	0	-	3	15-25	18-25	23-25			William G. Morgan Cup6-20Quarterfinals William G. Morgan Cup	7	-	6
7	42	Jan 28, 2023	0	- (n)	3	25-27	24-26	17-25			National Championship7-42SEMIFINALS National Championship	7	-	7
8	6	Feb 26, 2023	3	- (n)	0	25-17	25-18	25-19			William G. Morgan Cup8-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	7	-	8
8	21	Apr 02, 2023	1	-	3	13-25	25-14	15-25	17-25		Non-Conference	7	-	9
12	28	Jun 17, 2024	0	-	3	23-25	21-25	13-25			William G. Morgan Cup12-28CHAMPIONSHIP WILLIAM G. MORGAN CUP	8	-	9
16	40	Nov 23, 2025	3	- (n)	2	20-25	25-22	25-19	23-25	15-10	TMVL Cup	9	-	9
17	22	Mar 22, 2026	1	- (n)	3	25-18	26-28	21-25	17-25		TMVL Cup17-22Round of 32 TMVL Cup	10	-	9
17	26	Mar 29, 2026	1	-	3	20-25	25-22	24-26	21-25		Non-Conference	11	-	9
18	26	Sep 20, 2026									Non-Conference

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.